Dapper Flight 5 Installation Report

[Lee Revell]

On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 22:49 +0100, Andreas Schildbach wrote:
> This time, I'll just post the bug numbers rather than writing a lengthy 
> report. From a users perspective, I can't tell that Flight 5 has changed 
> anything compared to Flight 2 besides some artwork.
> 
> I must admit that I'm a bit disappointed that none of my bugs since 
> Flight 2 have even been touched, let alone fixed (some have been 
> confirmed by other users though). I am beginning to have doubt about 
> filing bugs to that black hole called Malone...
> 
> However, here are the bugs I encountered:
> 
> https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28769
> https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/31233
> https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/27202
> https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/32804
> https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/30802
> https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/30803
> https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/31990
> https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/34953
> 

You don't give nearly enough information for some of these.  Here is one
of the reports in its entirety:

"This is a regression from Breezy: On my Dell Latitude X1, using an
Intel i915GMS chip, glxinfo returns "direct rendering: No". OpenGL
screenblankers look very un-accelerated.

I am using a fresh install of Dapper Daily Feb-03."

Um - lsmod output?  dmesg?  X logs?  Etc...?

Others were only reported 2-4 weeks ago, and have probably not been
looked at yet due to limited developer resources.

Lee