Alternative Init System

[Phillip Susi]

Scott James Remnant wrote:
> People, please take this thread away from ubuntu-devel.
> 
> It's already been established that we're not going to replace sysvinit
> for dapper, both on this list and in the specifications drawn up at UBZ.
> 
> I suggest you work together off-list to evaluate the different
> replacements, and create a Wiki page summarising what you find out and
> what effect each one has.
> 
> That can that perform the basis for BOFs at the next Summit, and
> possible be the foundation for considering replacing sysvinit in dapper
> +1.
> 

I fail to see why this should not be discussed here.  The subject matter 
pertains to the development of ubuntu so why doesn't it belong on the 
ubuntu development list?

Just because it won't make it in time for dapper doesn't mean we 
shouldn't talk about it.