Fwd: New ZeroConf Spec

Bruno Abinader brunoabinader at gmail.com
Tue Jul 25 03:06:02 BST 2006

Hi all,
I don't know if this is the right place to post it but, anyway, how about
UPnP? As for thousand of router users (that have a shared internet
connection at home) like me it is just a boreness to configure every
computer with a proper port for gaim, amule, and others. What about UPnP
embedded inside network-manager?


2006/7/24, Dick Davies <rasputnik at gmail.com>:

> On 24/07/06, Soren Hansen <sh at linux2go.dk> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 07:39:58PM +0100, Dick Davies wrote:
> > > >Not if you use IPSec to do the security.
> > > What does that gain you that WPA wouldn't anyway?
> >
> > WPA only deals with wireless security, while IPSec deals with
> > network-wide security between both wired and wireless hosts.
> But doesn't it only help with trusting the host, not the
> service?
> If so, it seems like a lot of work for little benefit (since
> IPsec enabled are just as prone to malware as others).
> --
> Rasputin :: Jack of All Trades - Master of Nuns
> http://number9.hellooperator.net/
> --
> ubuntu-devel mailing list
> ubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

Bruno de Oliveira Abinader

Bruno de Oliveira Abinader
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20060724/cfabcd7e/attachment.htm

More information about the ubuntu-devel mailing list