Alternative Init System

[John Nilsson]

On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 17:36 +1100, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> That slowness comes down to XP and 2000 implementing pretty much what
> you are advocating here - booting enough to get the GUI up, and letting
> the rest of the system run in the background.

Isn't this what dapper currently does? On my setup I get a lot of errors
with gaim not having access to the net an such right after boot. It
takes a few minutes before everything calms down.

I hope it isn't the plan to ship Dapper like this.

Regards,
John