*****[netclusive] SPAM-ERKENNUNG***** Irrelevance of the debate: (was "Epiphany versus Firefox" etc ad nauseam...

[Peter Garrett]

Spam detection software, running on the system "mx1.netclusive.de", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.

Content preview:  On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 05:28:58 +0100 John Nilsson 
  <john at milsson.nu> wrote: > On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 19:53 -0600, 
  Alejandro Bonilla wrote: > > What goes into the CD is what is most 
  popular/needed/expected/wanted. > > > > Am I wrong? > > I think the 
  argument is that Firefox in its current incarnation has some > 
  usability flaws that Epiphany doesn't. [...] 

Content analysis details:   (100.0 points, 5.0 required)

 pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
 100 USER_IN_BLACKLIST      From: address is in the user's black-list


-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Peter Garrett <peter.garrett at optusnet.com.au>
Subject: Irrelevance of the debate: (was "Epiphany versus Firefox" etc ad
	nauseam...
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:02:16 +1100
Size: 8348
Url: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20060213/9a87026c/attachment.eml