*****[netclusive] SPAM-ERKENNUNG***** Re: what is the reason for not making epiphany the default browser?

[John Nilsson]

Spam detection software, running on the system "mx1.netclusive.de", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.

Content preview:  On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 19:53 -0600, Alejandro Bonilla 
  wrote: > What goes into the CD is what is most 
  popular/needed/expected/wanted. > > Am I wrong? I think the argument 
  is that Firefox in its current incarnation has some usability flaws 
  that Epiphany doesn't. So assuming a default installation is most 
  important for non-power users, Epiphany would do a better job of 
  providing the browsing service. [...] 

Content analysis details:   (100.0 points, 5.0 required)

 pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 100 USER_IN_BLACKLIST      From: address is in the user's black-list
 0.0 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list


-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: John Nilsson <john at milsson.nu>
Subject: Re: what is the reason for not making epiphany the default browser?
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 05:28:58 +0100
Size: 4380
Url: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20060213/14fef3f8/attachment.eml