*****[netclusive] SPAM-ERKENNUNG***** Re: what is the reason for not making epiphany the default browser?

Lee Revell rlrevell at joe-job.com
Mon Feb 13 00:52:26 GMT 2006

Spam detection software, running on the system "mx1.netclusive.de", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.

Content preview:  On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 11:33 +1100, James Livingston 
  wrote: > On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 10:32 -0600, Alejandro Bonilla wrote: > 
  > HONESTLY, how many people would really select Epiphany over Firefox? 
  > > > > Let's be real, I'm not looking for people to vote, but I could 
  bet at > > least 80% would like FF over Epi. > > A while back, a poll 
  was added to the endless Ephy vs FF forum thread. > From memory it was 
  something like 70% Firefox, 20% Epiphany and 10% > Opera. > > The 
  debate then turned on to whether those results actually meant > 
  anything. There were plenty of claims about them, but the two 
  important > ones were that anyone who voted would install their 
  default anyway, and > that Epiphany was better for the people who 
  didn't care. > > > Whether those numbers are valid or not could still 
  be debated. [...] 

Content analysis details:   (100.0 points, 5.0 required)

 pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 100 USER_IN_BLACKLIST      From: address is in the user's black-list

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Lee Revell <rlrevell at joe-job.com>
Subject: Re: what is the reason for not making epiphany the default browser?
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 19:52:26 -0500
Size: 3925
Url: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20060212/3ea7a12b/attachment-0001.eml

More information about the ubuntu-devel mailing list