*****[netclusive] SPAM-ERKENNUNG***** Re: what is the reason for not making epiphany the default browser?

[Lee Revell]

Spam detection software, running on the system "mx1.netclusive.de", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.

Content preview:  On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 10:32 -0600, Alejandro Bonilla 
  wrote: > On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 02:01 -0500, Miles Lane wrote: > > On 
  2/11/06, MadMan2k <madman2k at gmx.de> wrote: > > > Carey O'Shea wrote: > 
  > To comment on this thread one more thing: > > HONESTLY, how many 
  people would really select Epiphany over Firefox? > > Let's be real, 
  I'm not looking for people to vote, but I could bet at > least 80% 
  would like FF over Epi. > [...] 

Content analysis details:   (100.0 points, 5.0 required)

 pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 100 USER_IN_BLACKLIST      From: address is in the user's black-list


-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Lee Revell <rlrevell at joe-job.com>
Subject: Re: what is the reason for not making epiphany the default browser?
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:26:38 -0500
Size: 3589
Url: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20060212/582b2ec4/attachment.eml