what is the reason for not making epiphany the default browser?

[Eric Dunbar]

On 2/11/06, Carey O'Shea <carey at internode.on.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 23:57 +0000, João Pinto wrote:
> > I don't know much about Epiphany (I have only tested it a few times),
> > but judging from the wikki the advantages are mainly about GNOME
> > integration (and the always funny crash comparison).
>
> The one thing I liked Epiphany was the nice GNOME icons/theme as a
> browser. However, Firefox looks just as "integrated" with GNOME when
> using theme: http://gnomefx.mozdev.org. Any comments on this theme being
> default? Makes GNOME look more streamlined, takes up less screen
> real-estate and you still get all the advantages of Firefox.

My vote is to leave the FireFox theme alone. Keep FF as cross-platform
standarized as possible.

Besides, I don't like the default Ubuntu GNOME theme as much as
YellowDogLinux's default GNOME theme, but, since these are all
personal preferences, YMMV ;-).

Eric.