CD image size recovery suggestions

[Tristan Wibberley]

Michael R. Head wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-08-28 at 13:35 +0100, Tristan Wibberley wrote:
>> Colin Watson wrote:
>>
>> Give it a printing wizard as good as Windows XP and I'll be a *huge* 
>> advocate for keeping it in. But without that, its just a cataloguing 
>> program for a specialist demographic.
> 
> f-spot does have basic photo printing functionality -- it's not great,
> but it's there. For more complex printing needs, gnome-photo-printer
> does exist in the universe.
> 
> I don't get the "specialist" argument. Is rhythmbox a "specialist" music
> player? 

f-spot's benefit over gthumb is that it is good for enthusiast 
photographers and professionals. Without good photo printing integrated 
into its browser facility, it is not a replacement for gthumb's 
"clueless" uses. rhythmbox is as good for clueless purposes as any other 
gnomish option, so it should be there off the bat.

However, I'm just going to check out gnome-photo-printer.

-- 
Tristan Wibberley - "it" is the preferred noun of an abated intellect.

These opinions are my own, and do not reflect those of my employer.