NTP server(s) to use
sh at sourcecode.de
Tue Apr 25 05:07:32 BST 2006
On Tuesday 25 April 2006 05:53, smurf at smurf.noris.de wrote:
> Abel Cheung:
> > From the page, they say the primary concern is the loading and
> > traffic of the ntp servers (e.g. flawed ntp client flooding
> > servers). If we are using our own server ntp people might actually
> > be happier.
> On the other hand, it _is_ a single point of failure.
> I'd rather have some redundancy.
Well, many people with latops/desktops with no current network
connection during boot won't care a lot about this or that ntp host,
most sureley, it doesn't matter.
But for measurement purposes an ntp server at CDC is much better then
pool.<vendor> cname pool.ntp.org.
A redundancy can be made, when some people who are using ubuntu and have
access to a realiable DC are setting up some ntp servers and canonical
is setting up the correct dns records. the CDC ntp server will be the
master for the others.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20060425/2684682e/attachment.pgp
More information about the ubuntu-devel