SMFication Project registered + proposal
erast at gnusolaris.org
Sat Apr 22 19:53:34 BST 2006
On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 11:11 +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 10:46 -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 13:41 -0400, Ivan Krstic wrote:
> > > Erast Benson wrote:
> > > > or other way around... if you get ubuntu to adopt it than debian will
> > > > accept it.
> > >
> > > Debian adopting SMF would pretty certainly cause Ubuntu to adopt it;
> > > going in the opposite direction is an unsafe bet that might come to
> > > hinge on volatile political matters, as is most often the case when
> > > Ubuntu and Debian are mentioned in the same sentence.
> > I see. You might be right. So, I take it back.
> > I think we need to prepare a proposal at debian-devel@
> There is already the replacement-init specification which I'm
> re-proposing for edgy, part of that includes discussing SMF.
I found replacement-init spec for ubuntu. Is this what you meant?
I also created smf-nexeneta spec. It is main goal to provide set of
debhelper scripts which will formalize future SMF integration into
Ubuntu and its current implementation in NexentaOS.
More information about the ubuntu-devel