John Richard Moser
nigelenki at comcast.net
Thu Oct 20 20:26:56 CDT 2005
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Martin Ericsson wrote:
> George Farris wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 23:11 +0200, Martin Ericsson wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Colin Watson wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Rather than making it actively difficult for users on the same system
>>>> (who, as I explained, will often be associated with each other and have
>>>> useful information to share with each other) to share files, I'd much
>>>> rather see increased UI prominence for permissions on files, so that
>>>> it's obvious when a file is world-readable and obvious how to hide its
>>>> contents.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Isn't a part of the problem that there is no an easy way to share
>>> files between the different users on a ubuntu system?
>>>
>>> As you stated, on many systems the different users corresponds to
>>> various family members. Yet if you want to share your music with
>>> everybody in the family you you have to point them to your home
>>> directory or create a common directory with o:rw and make sure that
>>> all users belong to the same group?
>>>
>>> So I think ubuntu should make sharing easier. Just as every file
>>> dialog has a home-icon, it should also have a pointer to a shared
>>> directory.
>>>
>>> Martin Ericsson
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> Having /home permissions be other than 0700 is a no no IMHO. It always
>> has been on UNIX systems. Privacy should be number one on the list with
>> the ability to loosen it up. If GDM is requiring this, it's wrong.
>> Users should have the option of having their home directory be locked
>> down, without loosing functionality such as GDM. If I misunderstood
>> this please ignore.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> You misunderstood, so maybe I didn't make my point very clearly.
>
> What I mean is that ubuntu should set up a shared directory that all
> (human) users can access. The permissions for that directory should be
> set to 770.
>
I use /home/shared with 01777 (same as /tmp)
I said this in another post :)
> If that sound unsafe you could have an option, "Allow access to shared
> directory" in users-admin->users permissions that adds them to the
> "shared files" group.
>
> That way you don't have set lose permissions (755) for your home
> directory just because you might want to share some of your files with
> your wife. You just place those files in the shared-directory instead.
>
> Martin Ericsson
>
>
>
- --
All content of all messages exchanged herein are left in the
Public Domain, unless otherwise explicitly stated.
Creative brains are a valuable, limited resource. They shouldn't be
wasted on re-inventing the wheel when there are so many fascinating
new problems waiting out there.
-- Eric Steven Raymond
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDWEPfhDd4aOud5P8RAkQ/AJ4lrXNaK/TeWljII8PzzdRYU2OnzACffNRU
eHQGK0J2OBk7qcY6TMrqAT0=
=Ofhw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the ubuntu-devel
mailing list