Release management thoughts for Dapper Drake

[Daniel Stone]

On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 09:31:24AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Daniel Stone [2005-10-17 15:05 +1000]:
> > On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 11:29:53PM -0500, Travis Watkins wrote:
> > > On 10/15/05, Daniel Stone <daniel.stone at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> > > > Please stop using X.Org as an example of something that would be good
> > > > to freeze.
> > > 
> > > Because what we have now isn't nearly as bug-free as 7.0 is/will be?
> > > Just wondering.
> > 
> > We're going to need to do this thing for three years.  I know which I'd
> > prefer out of:
> >     * 7.0 final, with a few patches and tweaks, almost all either from
> >       upstream, or subsequently committed upstream, or
> 
> Will that also include the split server? Supporting that will be much
> nicer than supporting the whole big blob, won't it?

Yes and yes, mercifully.

Cheers,
Daniel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20051017/174799ab/attachment.pgp