Release management thoughts for Dapper Drake
jeff.waugh at ubuntu.com
Fri Oct 14 21:56:17 CDT 2005
<quote who="Scott James Remnant">
> > * GNOME 2.14, KDE
> > * Firefox 1.5
> > * Xorg 7
> > * OpenOffice.org 2
> > * Linux 2.6.new (probably 2.6.14)
> Which pretty much defines dapper main ... so exactly what do you want to
> freeze again?!
Whoa dude, main is much bigger than that.
> I think if we do want to do this "stable upstreams" release, the first
> things we should ditch are the above set and instead release with a
> known-good GNOME 2.12, Xorg 6.8, etc.
Nup, there are good, worthwhile reasons to continue with feature goals such
as these (remember, we're doing desktop support for 3 years, not 5 years).
> And I still think it's a bad idea; we've built up our reputation and
> user-base on the idea of having 6-monthly releases of the latest software
> -- and to suddenly not do that for a release seems like a mistake to me.
Much of the software with immediate end-user benefit will be covered by
feature goals. The core system, and in particular server stuff, would not.
> Given the kernel is our primary source of hardware compatibility and
> drivers, having two kernels seems like just making like difficult for our
> users. "Do you want the kernel behind door A, or door B?"
I don't think so - there are two very clear use cases here, which could
possibly be strengthened by strict support policy.
EuroOSCON: October 17th-20th http://conferences.oreillynet.com/eurooscon/
"And up in the corporate box there's a group of pleasant
thirtysomething guys making tuneful music for the masses of people who
can spell 'nihilism', but don't want to listen to it in the car." -
Richard Jinman, SMH
More information about the ubuntu-devel