kjcole at gri.gallaudet.edu
Mon Nov 28 21:05:43 GMT 2005
Corey Burger wrote:
> Automatically deleting things violates the concept that users data is
> sacred. There is no valid reason in my mind why this concept should be
> broken anywhere.
I dunno: If people don't understand that files (or whatever) marked tmp, or
trash -- in whatever language they know -- are temporary and trash, there's
no hope for communicating anything to them. Taken to the logical extreme,
should every edit of any file produce a versioned backup a la VAX/VMS
(file.txt;1 file.txt;2 ... file.txt;367) never automatically deleting prior
versions? Or should it only go back one revision (file.txt~, file.txt) as is
typical of many Linux editors? By your argument, the concept is ALREADY
broken. I think the expectation of most computer users is that trash grows
rancid after a while and probably should just "go away" eventually.
I have nothing against offering some sort of tiered way of disposing files,
but "Trash", to me, has a pretty strong, specific meaning. If you want a
holding area for pending files, call it something else... I don't know "Limbo"
"Twilight Zone", "Bermuda Triangle" "Cryolab"... Someplace that you expect
things to come back from. ;-)
Kevin Cole | Key ID: 0xE6F332C7
Gallaudet University | WWW: http://gri.gallaudet.edu/~kjcole/
Hall Memorial Bldg S-419 | V/TTY: (202) 651-5135
Washington, D.C. 20002-3695 | FAX: (202) 651-5746
"Using vi is not a sin. It's a penance." -- St. IGNUcious, Church of Emacs
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 256 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20051128/dac35779/signature-0001.pgp
More information about the ubuntu-devel