lathiat at bur.st
Tue Nov 8 17:08:39 CST 2005
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 11:28:01PM +0100, Thom Holwerda wrote:
> >Not that I enjoy opening a can of worms, but might I suggest that we
> >consider using a more intuitive version numbering system?
> >One idea comes to mind, and from what I can see this is the least
> >different yet still intuitive approach we could do. Simply keep the
> >major version number as the year, but instead give the minor version
> >number as the ordered release number for that year. So, our first
> >release in 2006 would be 6.1, our second 6.2, and so forth.
> Why not use the same versioning scheme Ubuntu has now, just more
> 5.10 would be 2005.10
That wouldn't make a difference
> Thom Holwerda
> Managing editor at http://www.osnews.com, exploring the future of
> Read my *all new* blog: http://cogscanthink.blogsome.com/
> Google Talk: ThomHolwerda at gmail.com
> ubuntu-devel mailing list
> ubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
Trent Lloyd <lathiat at bur.st>
Bur.st Networking Inc.
More information about the ubuntu-devel