slakje at quicknet.nl
Tue Nov 8 16:28:01 CST 2005
> Not that I enjoy opening a can of worms, but might I suggest that we
> consider using a more intuitive version numbering system?
> One idea comes to mind, and from what I can see this is the least
> different yet still intuitive approach we could do. Simply keep the
> major version number as the year, but instead give the minor version
> number as the ordered release number for that year. So, our first
> release in 2006 would be 6.1, our second 6.2, and so forth.
Why not use the same versioning scheme Ubuntu has now, just more
5.10 would be 2005.10
Managing editor at http://www.osnews.com, exploring the future of
Read my *all new* blog: http://cogscanthink.blogsome.com/
Google Talk: ThomHolwerda at gmail.com
More information about the ubuntu-devel