lool+ubuntu at via.ecp.fr
Thu Nov 3 10:46:31 CST 2005
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Now, what would be helpful is a clear and concise list of which parts of
> ffmpeg are free and which are awkwardly patent encumbered, and whether
> it's practical to split the two of them out.
You mean something like a per-source file checklist?
some-patent [ ]
some-us-patent [ ]
some-european-patent [ ]
some-patent-on-a-related-thing [ ]
some-patent-but-not-enforced [ ]
dmca-compliant [ ]
eucd-compliant [ ]
reverse-engineered [ ]
reverse-engineered-in-the-us [ ]
reverse-engineered-by-dvdjon [ ]
written-with-nda'd-documentation [ ]
written-by-ibm-while-working-for-sco [ ]
maybe-free [ ]
Loïc Minier <lool at dooz.org>
"What do we want? BRAINS! When do we want it? BRAINS!"
More information about the ubuntu-devel