Breezy Goals - please check

[Dennis Kaarsemaker]

On di, 2005-05-10 at 17:38 +0200, Bastian Doetsch wrote:

> While reading through the WirelessManagement part I noticed, that only
> WEP is gonna be supported. Since WEP is cryptologically unsafe,
> wouldn't it be appropriate to include support for WPA in Breezy?

It has not been discussed at the IRC meeting, so it is not in this list.
The low priority items (wpa and others) will either be discussed here or
in another meeting.
-- 
Dennis K.
 <- Are you suicidal?
 -> Only in the morning.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20050510/02ebaf8a/attachment.pgp