sudo doesn't support bash aliases

[John Richard Moser]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 09:32:55PM -0500, John Richard Moser wrote:
> 
>>>But "sudo rm file" doesn't takes care of the alises. "sudo rm file" is
>>>not translated to "sudo rm -i file".
>>
>>Good.  Keep it that way.  If you don't understand why it's that way,
>>then don't fuck with it.
> 
> 
> Language, please.

Sorry, long day at work, and sensing impending security nightmare after
being paid to proport that some magic "Security center" that slaps onto
windows could in fact be secure (while it's in teh handbook that things
like CoolWWW and such actually disable exactly those countermeasures and
block access to sites that have tools to remove them).

I'll post when I get a day off.  As for my earlier post, I'll leave
figuring that out as a challenge for the reader, or someone else can
hand him the answer sheet.
- --
All content of all messages exchanged herein are left in the
Public Domain, unless otherwise explicitly stated.

    Creative brains are a valuable, limited resource. They shouldn't be
    wasted on re-inventing the wheel when there are so many fascinating
    new problems waiting out there.
                                                 -- Eric Steven Raymond
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCPkrvhDd4aOud5P8RAofAAJ9RK1Gq4NLnkbbeBVOP2n1W05vcfQCeOiJk
bUkVQguSVWfO//a0GZCgqgk=
=IqT7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----