USplash's status?
Colin Watson
cjwatson at ubuntu.com
Tue Mar 1 14:56:55 CST 2005
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 07:40:46AM +1100, Shimon wrote:
> Isn't the real reason because ubuntu's policy is not to take any
> patches on the kernel which are not accepted upstream (fedora also has
> this policy thats why they made rhgb... but thats out of the question
> as it takes about 20 seconds till it starts as it loads x....) and to
> my memory bootsplash is rejected as it doesn't work on many gfx
> cards....
We reverted bootsplash because it broke the installer. I uploaded the
reversion at the Oxford conference while attempting to prepare a Sounder
release, so I should know. We then discussed it at some length at Oxford
and decided on usplash as the best option.
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson at ubuntu.com]
More information about the ubuntu-devel
mailing list