Automatic and silent installation of security updates
Till Varoquaux
till.varoquaux at gmail.com
Mon Jul 11 10:05:41 CDT 2005
I sent this before.... just not to the mailling list:
No the kernel is diffenitly something you would *not* want to be upgradded
without knowing because:
_You could have drivers you compilled for yourselves. Those won't work with
the new kernel wihout being recompilled and might leave you with an usable
system.
_You could use an external bootloader which needs updating (suppose you have
a dual boot with lilo managed by the other bootable system...)
_A whole lot of other reasons.
If someone wants to implement this feature you must take great care of
upgradding only want should be upgarded (breaking binary compatibility is a
no-no for instance).
So I'm not against upgradding silently but a think there should be at least
three level the user can choose from:
_None (nope I don't want this).
_No breakage of binary cmpatibility (I have my stuff compilled by me and
will be very pissed if I wake up one morning and find it doesn't work any
more)
_Full fledge.
Till
On 7/11/05, Ewan Mac Mahon <ewan at macmahon.me.uk> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 04:15:58PM +0200, Martijn van de Streek wrote:
> > On Fri, 08 Jul 2005, Wouter Stomp wrote:
> >
>
> > > About the kernel, I don't think that should be silently upgraded
> either.
> >
> I don't think there's a problem with automatically installing new
> kernels; only if the grub default changes to the new one. Updates on
> RedHat, for example, point the default at the old kernel until you
> change it manually.
>
> > How should an upgrade-tool distinguish between kernels and other
> > packages?
> >
> There's some kernel spotting logic in apt somewhere already to make it
> object if you try to remove the package of the running kernel so it
> might be possible to use that.
>
> Ewan
>
> --
> Other ways to find me:
> Jabber: ewan (at) jabber.org.uk <http://jabber.org.uk> | MSN: ewanmacmahon
> (at) hotmail.co.uk <http://hotmail.co.uk>
> IRC: ewan on irc.freenode.net <http://irc.freenode.net> | GPG: Key ID
> 0xC28828A4
>
>
> BodyID:56538349.2.n.logpart (stored separately)
>
> --
> ubuntu-devel mailing list
> ubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20050711/2f987292/attachment-0001.htm
More information about the ubuntu-devel
mailing list