Epiphany vs. Firefox (Duck!)
Shimon
shimen at gmail.com
Tue Jan 18 09:52:33 CST 2005
look mozilla browser is more pop. because of the winbloze world so
more bugs fixes and features and patch will be put into it
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 15:41:26 +0000, Thom May <thom at canonical.com> wrote:
> * Danilo ??egan (danilo at kvota.net) wrote :
> > Today at 15:50, Sridhar Ratna wrote:
> >
> > > Epiphany needs ...
> > >
> > > 1. Dynamically Loadable extensions
> >
> > Aren't epiphany extensions dynamically loadable?
> >
> > > 2. Adblock (in cvs)
> > > 3. Firefox-like find
> > > 4. Better popup blocker
> >
> > None of these seem so essential to me. I.e. it's not like there's no
> > any kind of pop-up blocker, it's that it could be improved (and like
> > there is some which couldn't?). I don't know what's a "Firefox-like
> > find", but there's only so much "searching" that one can do in a web
> > page.
> >
> FWIW, he means Find-As-You-Type, which is the only thing missing from
> epiphany for me. It's a known problem caused by firefox changing the way it
> did find.
> -T
>
> --
> ubuntu-devel mailing list
> ubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
>
--
>From the desk of shimon.
More information about the ubuntu-devel
mailing list