Ubuntu "unstable" (was: 2 questions about ubuntu + offering)

Shimon shimen at gmail.com
Mon Feb 28 11:59:21 CST 2005


Or experiMENTAL? ok I admit it I stole it from debian.... any way i
was thinking something along the lines of a tiger as a tiger is alway
moving forward and so would be a devbranch


On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 18:43:41 +0100, Xan <DXpublica at telefonica.net> wrote:
> Dilluns 28 Febrer 2005 18:19, en/na Matt Zimmerman (<Matt Zimmerman
> <mdz at ubuntu.com>>) va escriure:
> >>Re: Ubuntu "unstable" (was: 2 questions about ubuntu + offering)
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 06:15:29PM +0100, Shot (Piotr Szotkowski) wrote:
> > > Matt Zimmerman:
> > > > This is reasonable, though I think we should call it something
> > > > else, in order to avoid confusion with Debian's unstable.
> > > >
> > > > Ideas?
> > >
> 
> What's about "devbranch" (development branch)?
> Or "ubuntu-unstable"?
> 
> These could not be confused with debian respositories.
> 
> Xan.
> 
> --
> ubuntu-devel mailing list
> ubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
> 


-- 
>From the desk of shimon.



More information about the ubuntu-devel mailing list