I was wondering why hoary has still those outdated wine packages in universe

Tim Schmidt timschmidt at gmail.com
Wed Feb 16 11:23:39 CST 2005


I should also mention I'm using a Hoary snapshot from the 13th of Feb.

--tim


On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 12:21:11 -0500, Tim Schmidt <timschmidt at gmail.com> wrote:
> I for one am using Scott's packages from winehq.org and am very
> pleased.  They installed wonderfully after updating my sources.list
> and a dist-upgrade.  Smooth sailing the whole way and absolutely
> nothing to complain about.
> 
> --tim
> 
> 
> On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 17:12:14 +0000, Mike Hearn <mike at navi.cx> wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:53:49 +0100, Oliver Grawert wrote:
> > > indeed we are ;) and since the packages from scott are a significant
> > > fork from the debian packages they will need a reviewer who has deep
> > > knowledge of wine and the apps using it.
> >
> > They were developed according to discussion on wine-devel, after several
> > Wine devs (me included) expressed dissatisfaction with the current Wine
> > Debian packages. What kind of review do you need exactly? So far all our
> > users seem happy with the new packages and from the Wine perspective it's
> > all OK (indeed, the way the files are split seems optimal).
> >
> > thanks -mike
> >
> >
> > --
> > ubuntu-devel mailing list
> > ubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> > http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
> >
>



More information about the ubuntu-devel mailing list