XXI century and still using 386 packages...

[Alberto Núñez]

Hum, if it is compiled for i486, why not to name the debs as 486?
Maybe because is also 386 compatible?

On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 14:09:46 -0800, Matt Zimmerman <mdz at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 08:46:43AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> 
> > Basically, the only thing at 386 level is the instruction set.  The
> 
> And not even that, in fact (it's the i486 instruction set, which is
> actually a significant gain over i386).
> 
> --
>  - mdz
>