bug in netinstall?
v.sessink at openoffice.nl
Wed Dec 14 12:06:52 GMT 2005
At Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 11:04:30AM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> No, because the base system (including base-config) is only installed
> from breezy, not breezy-updates, so we'd have to change the released
> breezy suite itself which is something we've never yet done for any
OK, can understand that. BTW, this means, off course, that one shouldn't try
to "fix" the archive as well (which is, if I understand you correctly, what
has been done to the archive to "fix" Kubuntu and Edubuntu), because that
is, in a way, a change to the Breezy suite as well.
We have, in fact, had earlier problems with the archive, then due to a
restore that was done without changing the time stamp of the restored file.
I hope this all leads to a more ehrm, conservative policy on changing
anything in the archive ;-)
> > Another trick could be to add the string to pxelinux.cfg/default (Until the
> Again that would require an installer rebuild and getting everyone to
Ehrm, yes, off course. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Installation/Netboot has the
fix for now, that's the best I could think of. If the archive has been
fixed, this comment can be removed again.
http://www.openoffice.nl/ Open Office - Linux Office Solutions
Valentijn Sessink v.sessink at openoffice.nl +31(0)20-4214059
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20051214/76eedd72/attachment.pgp
More information about the ubuntu-devel