emacs in default selection ?

Martin Pitt martin.pitt at canonical.com
Wed Oct 6 13:35:37 CDT 2004


Hi!

Oliver Grawert [2004-10-06 20:21 +0200]:
> hi,
> Am Dienstag, den 05.10.2004, 21:30 -0700 schrieb Matt Zimmerman:
> > Both vim and emacs are traditional Linux editors, and while they are not
> > suitable for a front-line position in the desktop (being rather
> > idiosyncratic), they are made available for those who are accustomed to
> > using them.
> > 
> > The fact that vim-gnome currently adds an item to the menu is a bug (#1771).
> while i understand your points and in fact totally agree on both i would rather
> suggest to leave them both uninstalled on the cd (like i.e. gcc), a devloper will
> know how to install them and joe user (who probably sits in a so called third world 
> country and has pretty limited HW) doesn't need them.

Although I use to have vim as the only editor on all of my systems,
I'm certainly not the representative user of Ubuntu, so actually I
agree with you.

We should have vi installed by default though, since it has a long
standing Unix tradition and is quite small. People who want the full
power of vim will know how to get it.

But I'm not sure whether we can modify the seeds this close to the
release...

Martin

-- 
Martin Pitt                       http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer            http://www.ubuntulinux.org
Debian GNU/Linux Developer       http://www.debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20041006/49da7ce1/attachment.pgp


More information about the ubuntu-devel mailing list