emacs in default selection ?
mdz at canonical.com
Tue Oct 5 23:30:43 CDT 2004
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 02:12:47AM +0200, Oliver Grawert wrote:
> is there a reason that i get an emacs installation of ~40MB in a default
> warty ?
> it has not even a menu icon (in opposition to gnome-vim which has an
> icon and is ~15MB).
Both vim and emacs are traditional Linux editors, and while they are not
suitable for a front-line position in the desktop (being rather
idiosyncratic), they are made available for those who are accustomed to
The fact that vim-gnome currently adds an item to the menu is a bug (#1771).
More information about the ubuntu-devel