Thoughts about separating language packs

[Fabio Massimo Di Nitto]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jeff Waugh wrote:
| On Thu, 2004-11-04 at 06:59 +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
|
|>I think the trigger should be done only on a daily base and not more
|>often, otherwise we will endup in a endless update of these language
|>packages.
|
|
| It has to be done at build time, otherwise you'd have to modify built
| packages and the language packs would be out of sync.
|
| - Jeff
|

If you upload 20 packages in a raw that will trigger the update, you
will also get 20 x n-languages packages rebuild. I don't think this is
an acceptable amount of data to push to users tracking hoary/unstable.

You will end up with users putting the lang packages on hold.

So the idea of accomulating the changes to the lang package and push
them once a day, if required, is imho an acceptable compromise.

Fabio

- --
Self-Service law:
The last available dish of the food you have decided to eat, will be
inevitably taken from the person in front of you.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
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=LHEc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----