Request for testing new libc6 for language packs
martin.pitt at canonical.com
Mon Dec 13 13:41:46 CST 2004
Colin Watson [2004-12-13 16:17 +0000]:
> > Yes, I'm aware of that, but rebuilding the archive is quite simply not
> > an option.
> I understood Martin to mean manually uploading various packages that
> need locale changes to modify what they spit out, rather than an
> automatic archive rebuild.
Indeed; given the amount of synced packages from Debian and the
current upload rate, there shouldn't be sooo much packages left at the
end which still contain translations. To avoid apt/dpkg troubles, the
remaining packages should be uploaded with a new version number at the
end (but no other changes).
I would vote against not rebuilding untouched packages, though. It's
not only a matter of CD space, but also a matter of avoiding to
download redundant data in debs.
Martin Pitt http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntulinux.org
Debian GNU/Linux Developer http://www.debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20041213/49fb0fbd/attachment.pgp
More information about the ubuntu-devel