Request for testing new libc6 for language packs

[Martin Pitt]

Hi!

Colin Watson [2004-12-13 16:17 +0000]:
> > Yes, I'm aware of that, but rebuilding the archive is quite simply not
> > an option.
> 
> I understood Martin to mean manually uploading various packages that
> need locale changes to modify what they spit out, rather than an
> automatic archive rebuild. 

Indeed; given the amount of synced packages from Debian and the
current upload rate, there shouldn't be sooo much packages left at the
end which still contain translations. To avoid apt/dpkg troubles, the
remaining packages should be uploaded with a new version number at the
end (but no other changes).

I would vote against not rebuilding untouched packages, though. It's
not only a matter of CD space, but also a matter of avoiding to
download redundant data in debs.

Martin

-- 
Martin Pitt                       http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer            http://www.ubuntulinux.org
Debian GNU/Linux Developer       http://www.debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20041213/49fb0fbd/attachment.pgp