<div dir="ltr">Nish,<br>       Can you recreate your test packaging on <a href="https://launchpad.net/~nacc/+archive/ubuntu/tomcat8v2/+packages">https://launchpad.net/~nacc/+archive/ubuntu/tomcat8v2/+packages</a> based off of the current tomcat8 package in xenial? I would be happy to test if your proposed bug fixes resolve the problems with ubuntu's tomcat failing to run the MetaboAnalyst war application properly.<div>                  Jack</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 4:23 PM, Nish Aravamudan <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:nish.aravamudan@canonical.com" target="_blank">nish.aravamudan@canonical.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 12:00 PM, Robie Basak <<a href="mailto:robie.basak@ubuntu.com">robie.basak@ubuntu.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 09:48:06AM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:<br>
>>    Is there a reason that the patches present in the test tomcat8<br>
>> 8.0.32-1ubuntu1.3~ppa2 were dropped from tomcat8 8.0.32-1ubuntu1.4?<br>
><br>
> Where were you getting 8.0.32-1ubuntu1.3~ppa2 from? That doesn't sound<br>
> like something that would have been published by Ubuntu.<br>
<br>
</div></div>I believe that is referring to the version in  my PPA at<br>
<a href="https://launchpad.net/~nacc/+archive/ubuntu/tomcat8v2/+packages" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://launchpad.net/~nacc/+<wbr>archive/ubuntu/tomcat8v2/+<wbr>packages</a>. It<br>
feels more productive to contact me directly, but on the list is fine<br>
too.<br>
<br>
That test build was for several LP bugs for tomcat8.<br>
<br>
<a href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat8/+bug/1593854" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://bugs.launchpad.net/<wbr>ubuntu/+source/tomcat8/+bug/<wbr>1593854</a> - no<br>
response to latest testing yet<br>
<a href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat7/+bug/1482893" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://bugs.launchpad.net/<wbr>ubuntu/+source/tomcat7/+bug/<wbr>1482893</a> - no<br>
testing feedback<br>
<a href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat8/+bug/1606331" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://bugs.launchpad.net/<wbr>ubuntu/+source/tomcat8/+bug/<wbr>1606331</a> -<br>
tested successfully<br>
<a href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat8/+bug/1644144" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://bugs.launchpad.net/<wbr>ubuntu/+source/tomcat8/+bug/<wbr>1644144</a> - no<br>
testing feedback<br>
<br>
It's hard for me, with confidence, to upload fixes to the archive with<br>
no testing feedback. And, it's not uncommon for there to be "races"<br>
between uploaders -- in this case, ubuntu1.4 has a fix for a totally<br>
unrelated bug to the above.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
-Nish<br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div>