<font size=1 face="Segoe UI Semibold"><i>That sounds like a knotty task.
Is lilo not yet deprecated for Ubuntu 12.04+ on all platforms?</i></font>
<br><font size=1 face="Segoe UI Semibold"><i>Ok, myself is a limited sample,
but I've not seen it in the last 10ish years even on non-Debian.</i></font>
<br>
<br><font size=1 face="Segoe UI Semibold"><i>What if the added symlinks
were only done for Grub, or can't the installer work out what the bootloader
is?</i></font>
<br>
<br><font size=3><SNIP></font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">> </font><font size=3>I'd like to
see everything collected in /boot</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><SNIP></font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">It sounds like what I am suggesting
is in line with current thinking and if no current enhancement request
</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">exists (I can't find one) then I ask
that I should create this one.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I don't think I've got the knowledge
or regression test platforms to be able to determine the effects. </font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I'll leave this thread for a few days
to give other a chance to chip in.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Regards,</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Jason.</font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">From:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Colin Watson <cjwatson@ubuntu.com></font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">To:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com,
</font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Date:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">14/07/2015 13:38</font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Subject:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Re: Kernel install
in boot with GRUB</font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Sent by:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">ubuntu-devel-discuss-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com</font>
<br>
<hr noshade>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=3>On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 01:22:17PM +0100, </font><a href=mailto:jason.morgan@aveillant.com><font size=3 color=blue><u>jason.morgan@aveillant.com</u></font></a><font size=3>
wrote:<br>
> Can anybody recall the purpose behind the 'historical compatibility'
, is <br>
> there a previous bug that I can reference in our documentaiton?<br>
<br>
One problem is that the default lilo configuration had problems with it<br>
(</font><a href="https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=329994"><font size=3 color=blue><u>https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=329994</u></font></a><font size=3>).
I'd like to<br>
see everything collected in /boot, indeed, but somebody is going to need<br>
to go through base-installer and kernel packaging revision history in<br>
some detail to work out all of the ramifications.<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Colin Watson [</font><a href=mailto:cjwatson@ubuntu.com><font size=3 color=blue><u>cjwatson@ubuntu.com</u></font></a><font size=3>]<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list</font><font size=3 color=blue><u><br>
</u></font><a href="mailto:Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com"><font size=3 color=blue><u>Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com</u></font></a><font size=3><br>
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: </font><a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss"><font size=3 color=blue><u>https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss</u></font></a><font size=3><br>
</font>