<html> <head> <style></style></head> <body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'><span style="font-size: 12pt;">> Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:39:30 -0700</span><br><div>> From: robert.park@canonical.com<br>> To: ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com<br>> Subject: Re: Aptitude installed by default on 13.10?<br>> <br>> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:22:28AM -0700, Robert Holtzman wrote:<br>> > On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 07:33:23PM +0000, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn wrote:<br>> > > >Thereby removing one more user choice. Choice is one of the bedrocks of<br>> > > >linux. Thanks guys. That's one of the main reasons I dumped ubuntu and<br>> > > >went to debian.<br>> > ><br>> > > Have aptitude is a plus, you don't remove any choice:<br>> > > if you want, do:sudo apt-get install aptitudeThe thing I hate is the proxy configuration for network..<br>> > > is very expensive to have the "apply to the whole system"???<br>> > > The actual behavior only sets the proxy for the current user,<br>> > > and when you try do: sudo ... you can't !!<br>> ><br>> > You lost me. Could you clarify?<br>> <br>> I think Alan is referring to the inconsistent implementations of<br>> proxies in various packages. In particular, if he configures a proxy<br>> for his current user, no commands he runs as "sudo" will observe that.<br>> so if he's behind a proxy, nothing run under sudo can access the<br>> internet properly. It's a pain.</div><div><br></div><div>Exactly!</div><div><br>> <br>> -- <br>> Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list<br>> Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com<br>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss<br></div> </div></body> </html>