<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Reinhard Tartler <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:siretart@ubuntu.com">siretart@ubuntu.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">On So, Okt 30, 2011 at 15:11:04 (CET), staticd wrote:<br>
<br>
>> Windows NT is designed so that, unless system security is already<br>
>> compromised in some other way, only the Winlogon process, a trusted<br>
>> system process, can receive notification of this keystroke<br>
>> combination. This is because the kernel remembers the process ID of<br>
>> the Winlogon process, and allows only that process to receive the<br>
>> notification.<br>
>><br>
>> So says Wikipedia.<br>
>><br>
>> Interestingly, VMWare catches the sequence as well.<br>
>><br>
>><br>
> I was thinking of a Alt+Sysrq combination capturable only by the kernel.<br>
> (Ctrl+Alt+Sysrq ?)<br>
<br>
</div>The SAK for Linux systems is Alt+Sysrq+k<br>
<br>
While this SAK can be disabled, Ubuntu ships with this functionality<br>
enabled. It safely and uncatchably terminates your running X11 session,<br>
returning back to your login manager.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Reinhard.<br>
<br>
--<br>
Gruesse/greetings,<br>
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com">Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com</a><br>
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss" target="_blank">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss</a><br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>Reinhard, <br>doesn't pressing Alt+Sysrq+k kill the current X session?<br>Is there a secure way of getting the login manager without disrupting other users who are also working in the background? (a switch user functionality that cannot be spoofed)<br>
<br>Do you know how i could go about implementing this?<br>