Hiyas Daniel, I'd also like to see the simple ability to make (and recommend) a /home partion rather than ask a n00b to delve into the tender mercies of manual partitioning. Hopefully, one day the dev team may catch their breath and incorporate it. :) Regards, Phill. <div class="gmail_quote">On 26 December 2010 13:20, Daniel Gross <<a href="mailto:daniel.gross@utoronto.ca">daniel.gross@utoronto.ca</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> <div dir="ltr"><pre>Hello I just had a really bad experience while working with Ubuntu 10.10, which suggested to me another reason for having a separate home folder. My ext4 boot partition with all my data became inaccessible -- not mountable, not checkable, only accessible via dd or ddrescue, but the data coming out is very partial (the image i am getting claims to be of type ext2, for some reason, so can't be checked either). I had just started a new virtual machine, and then the hard drive started spinning at "full speed", with the computer not responding. After a while I felt that the only way out is a hard reset. Unfortunately, either the spinning out of control, or the hard reset, or both, have damaged the ext4 partition in a significant way. Interestingly, a second NTFS partition (with my preinstalled windows xp pro on it) wasn't affected, and i was able to boot windows xp without problems, but not able to access the ext4 partition, also not with a special ext4 file system utility. After much trial and error i still can not properly access the ext4 partition, getting a "drive exclusively in use by other process or mounted error?". I happened to have another 320 SATA drive around, which i am not freshly installing with ubuntu 10.10. To avoid such problems with the boot partition in the future, I decided to the the following partitioning scheme. Ubuntu Boot partition -- 40 GB, ext4 Primary NTFS partition of size 220 GB, mounted at /windows Primary NTFS partition of size 60 GB, not mounted. My plan is to move my home directory to the 220GB partition. Like this if the ubuntu ext4 boot partition fails again, i will hopefully be able to access all my data from both windows and ubuntu rescue facilities. So, the reason to move the home directory to a different partition (and file system type), relates to not putting all your files in one ext4 boot partition basket. Daniel On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Daniel Gross <<a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss" target="_blank">daniel.gross at utoronto.ca</a>> wrote: > Hello, > > I have finally taken the plunge and installed the latest Ubuntu instead > of Windows XP (while still running Windows xp in a VM). Congrats :) > It would be great if a tool existed that supports moving the home folder > from the "boot" partition to a "data" partition. Ideally, the tool would > support creating a data partition by resizing the boot partition, as > well as recommending a minimum size for the data partition based on the > size of the home folder. > > Ideally, i think, such a setup could already be suggested during the > Ubuntu installation process. Perhaps, under an "advanced setup" heading > -- removing the need to move the home partition. > > The main benefit for such a setup, is that it allows reinstalling Ubuntu > without loosing the users data, which would be safely sitting in a > separate data partition. Putting it on a separate partition isn't actually necessary. Currently when Ubuntu is directed to install to a partition which previously had Ubuntu on it, it reinstalls only what is necessary, leaving things such as user settings intact. So this is effectively already done, just without the necessity for multiple partitions. > Also, during (re)installation, Ubuntu could recognize the existence of a > data partition that includes a home folder, and suggest configuring > itself accordingly. This is an interesting idea. I'm not sure what we currently suggest when another Ubuntu is already installed, but a kind of reinstall/upgrade option would probably be useful. Again, we'd only need the one partition for it though. > Taking this idea a step further, perhaps its possible to also preserve > the packages that were installed, so that these remain intact in the > data partition also. Perhaps a better name for the data partition could > be "User" partition, which includes all user configured, tailored, > created data. As opposed to the System partition which includes the base > OS only, and that can be reinstalled at will. Technically, every part of Ubuntu (including the base OS) is considered just an installed package, so doing this wouldn't be simple. I'm also having trouble seeing the use case for this - most people (in my experience) reinstall Ubuntu as a way to clean up cruft (or apparent cruft - a fresh install often feels faster just by placebo effect). Presumably they would want such packages removed, else why would they reinstall? They're may be something I'm missing, but I can't see "reinstalling while keeping current packages" to be a common desire. You've raised some very interesting points, all of which merit further discussion. Enjoy your shiny new Ubuntu :) Cheers, Evan </pre></div> -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list <a href="mailto:Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com">Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com</a> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss" target="_blank">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss</a> </blockquote></div>