I believe Deja-Dup was originally started for the purpose of becoming default. At the very least, it is simple, useful and actively developed.<br><br><a href="https://launchpad.net/deja-dup">https://launchpad.net/deja-dup</a><br>
<br>I'm not sure how stable it as at the moment, since I'm not actively using it, but I have poked around its interface a bit.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/1/27 Flįvio Etrusco <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:flavio.etrusco@gmail.com">flavio.etrusco@gmail.com</a>></span><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">+1.<br>
<br>
Even a manual backup utility would suffice to me ;)<br>
Is there a bug entry for this?<br>
<br>
Best regards,<br>
<font color="#888888">Flįvio<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Caleb Marcus<br>
<<a href="mailto:caleb.marcus%2Bu-d-d@gmail.com">caleb.marcus+u-d-d@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Yes, yes, yes. I fully agree.<br>
> Currently I use an anacron job running rdiff-backup, but this is CLEARLY not<br>
> right for non-techie users.<br>
> I stopped using Simple Backup ages ago... it was really deficient. For one<br>
> thing, its incremental backups had to be restored like so: 1) restore last<br>
> full backup 2) restore next incremental 3) rinse and repeat until you're<br>
> restored to the right date.<br>
><br>
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 3:14 AM, Aaron Whitehouse <<a href="mailto:lists@whitehouse.org.nz">lists@whitehouse.org.nz</a>><br>
> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> Hello all,<br>
>><br>
>> According to:<br>
>> <a href="https://help.ubuntu.com/community/BackupYourSystem" target="_blank">https://help.ubuntu.com/community/BackupYourSystem</a><br>
>> "Backup is essential." However, no tool to backup the system is<br>
>> available in the default installation.<br>
>><br>
>> By contrast, Mandrake (as it was then) included an excellent simple<br>
>> option built-in when I used it around five years ago:<br>
>> <a href="http://wiki.mandriva.com/en/Docs/Howto/Drakbackup" target="_blank">http://wiki.mandriva.com/en/Docs/Howto/Drakbackup</a><br>
>><br>
>> I have just read through all of the Wiki pages I could find on the topic:<br>
>><br>
>> <a href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Home?action=fullsearch&from=0&context=180&value=backup" target="_blank">https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Home?action=fullsearch&from=0&context=180&value=backup</a><br>
>> and it seems that each release brings a new spec to include a backup<br>
>> program by default and, each release, people write out the use-cases,<br>
>> set out the alternative backup programs available and argue about<br>
>> missing features. Then the release happens and no backup program is<br>
>> installed by default.<br>
>><br>
>> Simple-backup-suite appears to be the most officially-sanctioned backup<br>
>> solution for the simple use-case and I understand that it was designed<br>
>> for Ubuntu (during the 2005 GSoC) for this purpose. Unfortunately, the<br>
>> project does not seem at all maintained, which makes it unlikely that<br>
>> bugs will be fixed or features added. The facility to restore backups is<br>
>> also pretty primitive (as far as I can tell), requiring the user to<br>
>> search through each backup file one-by-one to find the correct<br>
>> version(s) of a file, rather than having any master indexes.<br>
>><br>
>> I would really like to see Canonical/Ubuntu officially support this<br>
>> crucial part of the desktop. There are so many choices for backup, each<br>
>> with subtle differences, that having a recommendation would be very<br>
>> valuable to all but the most skilled backup experts. Canonical/Ubuntu<br>
>> supporting one backup program would also no-doubt encourage further<br>
>> activity in that program. Finally, there could be excellent<br>
>> (revenue-generating?) opportunities to offer an option to backup to<br>
>> Ubuntu One etc.<br>
>><br>
>> I understand and appreciate the differences between the backup programs<br>
>> (some using inotify and hard-links, some using diffs and archive files<br>
>> etc.), but I feel that it is one of those cases where it is more<br>
>> important to encourage the user to backup the system in any of the<br>
>> available ways than to keep arguing about the most technically-correct<br>
>> approach.<br>
>><br>
>> Regards,<br>
>><br>
>> Aaron<br>
>><br>
>> --<br>
>> Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com">Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com</a><br>
>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:<br>
>> <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss" target="_blank">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss</a><br>
><br>
><br>
> --<br>
> Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com">Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com</a><br>
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:<br>
> <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss" target="_blank">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss</a><br>
><br>
><br>
<br>
</div></div>--<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5">Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com">Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com</a><br>
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss" target="_blank">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>