<div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 7:35 AM, nergar <<a href="mailto:nergar@gmail.com">nergar@gmail.com</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> Tim Hawkins wrote: > Connecting and transferring data online during an offline media install > is not an expected activity, No? why not? Its just getting updates! </blockquote><div> </div></div>It doesn't really matter what "it" *is* "just" doing, what (only) matters in this case is the user's perception. I would still say that the thread starter's position is really somewhat in excess in the way he describes it, but i will *fully* agree with the issue, that connecting for updates should be given consent to first. It's merely a formality, but a not unimportant one at that. BTW when starting Firefox you know what you are doing because you are starting it and know it's going online; there might be people who don't but those probably won't be installing an OS either, and if they do, why not warn even these people about a connection attempt anyway? Ubiquity is the first contact of users with their OS of choice (apparently so, since they are installing it), and the first impression should be only the best. -- Please note that according to the German law on data retention, information on every electronic information exchange with me is retained for a period of six months. [Bitte beachten Sie, dass dem Gesetz zur Vorratsdatenspeicherung zufolge jeder elektronische Kontakt mit mir sechs Monate lang gespeichert wird.]