On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 11:43 AM, Luke L <<a href="mailto:lukehasnoname@gmail.com">lukehasnoname@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<a href="http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=769112" target="_blank">http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=769112</a><br>
<br>
NOW people realize that something is wrong with the dev cycle!<br></blockquote></div><br>I started a discussion on the dev cycle on this list a while back<br><br><a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-discuss/2007-December/002803.html">https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-discuss/2007-December/002803.html</a><br>
<br>It continues here in the January-08 archive:<br><br><a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-discuss/2008-January/002813.html">https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-discuss/2008-January/002813.html</a><br>
<br>A lot of ideas were tossed around, but nothing really came of it.<br><br>Whatever the case with our release cycle though, we do need to cover our bugs better. I have reported several reproducible bugs that include all the correct information, but that haven't even been triaged yet. Some of these date back to the Gutsy development cycle (and are still around in my up-to-date Hardy).<br>
<br>I am personally in favour of adding no new features at all to the next
LTS. Do the upstream merge from debian, but don't change anything else. Just fix bugs.<br>