I outlined in my specification (<a href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/No-Mono-by-Default">https://wiki.ubuntu.com/No-Mono-by-Default</a>) how gThumb has more functionality than F-Spot, is more efficient memory wise and takes up less space.
<br>Thanks,<br>Bryan<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Jan 15, 2008 8:19 AM, Scott James Remnant <<a href="mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org">email@example.com</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 13:59 +0100, Wouter Stomp wrote:<br><br>> On Jan 15, 2008 5:59 AM, Bryan Quigley <<a href="mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org">email@example.com</a>> wrote:<br>> > I was wondering what the reasoning was to get rid of gThumb in the default
<br>> > install (ubuntu desktop package). Is their an application that has been<br>> > added to help people organize home movies that I missed?<br>><br>> To reduce duplication. F-spot is included to organize your photos (not
<br>> movies, but I don't think gthumb does that either?).<br>><br></div></div>Not to mention that nautilus and eog already handle 95% of gthumb's<br>functionality. You can open a folder in Nautilus, browse the files
<br>within it, double-click to make them bigger and use Next/Previous<br>buttons to move between them at full size.<br><br>Scott<br><font color="#888888">--<br>Scott James Remnant<br><a href="mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org">email@example.com