But server install and desktop install are really different. The server install disk wouldn't need to have even half of what the regular install disk has because you don't need any of that GUI junk on a server. <div class="gmail_quote">On Dec 13, 2007 3:51 AM, Michael R. Head <<a href="mailto:burner@suppressingfire.org">burner@suppressingfire.org</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> <div class="Ih2E3d">On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 02:36 -0600, Conrad Knauer wrote: > So let's use that as a dividing line; let's keep the 32-bit x86 disks > as CDs, BUT... let's switch the 64-bit disks to DVDs. </div>It's not uncommon for some servers to come with just a CD ROM drive (I manage a Dell PowerEdge running 64-bit dapper in such a configuration). For example, in its base configuration, the Dell SC440 is still being sold with a 48X CD-ROM Drive. These are just the machines on which users may wish to install Ubuntu's amd64 architecture. > CK > -- Michael R. Head <<a href="mailto:burner@suppressingfire.org"> burner@suppressingfire.org</a>> <a href="http://picasaweb.google.com/demiri.head.wedding" target="_blank">http://picasaweb.google.com/demiri.head.wedding</a> -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list <a href="mailto:Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com">Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com</a> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss" target="_blank"> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss</a> </blockquote></div> -- Mackenzie Morgan Linux User #432169 ACM Member #3445683 <a href="http://ubuntulinuxtipstricks.blogspot.com"> http://ubuntulinuxtipstricks.blogspot.com</a> <-my blog of Ubuntu stuff apt-get moo