On 10/11/07, Aaron C. de Bruyn <<a href="mailto:ubuntu-devel-discuss@darkpixel.com">ubuntu-devel-discuss@darkpixel.com</a>> wrote:<div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> Today a website generated a PDF file for me automatically and firefox popped up and asked if I wanted to download it. I hit 'OK' and it saved 'genpdf.asp' into my downloads folder. I was surprised to find bash wouldn't tab-complete the filename. Apparently there is new (newer than dapper) bash completion code that restricts completed files based on the initial part of the command. (/etc/bash_completion) I think this sucks. I spend a lot of time at the bash prompt and use tab-completion constantly. When you are in bash, I would expect you sorta know what you are doing. One example of where I *will* have issues is if I upgrade my home media server from Dapper to Gutsy. It stores all the video from my camcorder, copies of all my CDs and DVDs, pictures from digital cameras, etc... Most of the files don't have an extension because file extensions are sorta useless in Linux. If I upgrade to Gutsy it appears I won't be able to type in 'mplayer StarTrek-Wrath<TAB>' and have it fill in 'StarTrek-Wrath_of_Kahn'. So I guess I have two questions * Why does the tab-completion code that restricts based on command-names exist? What benefit does this restriction have to power users??</blockquote><div> I don't see the point why filenames needs to be tab-completed on default, it does it when it's necessary. Filenames does tab-complete on certain tasks and applications, depending on what are you trying to accomplish? For example, certain applications that require an input needs to tab-complete a filename on it's parameters ( i.e. rsync), and executable files like python, perl, ruby & bash scripts would need tab-completion to execute. If you really want to autocomplete your filenames, you might as well make your files executable, and lastly why do you think this is necessary? </div></div> -- "object-oriented programming is really just a common sense extension of structured programming" - Roger Sessions