[kernel-hardening] Why does no one care that Brad Spengler of GRSecurity is blatantly violating the intention of the rightsholders to the Linux Kernel?

Ralf Mardorf ralf.mardorf at alice-dsl.net
Thu Jun 15 21:10:53 UTC 2017


On Thu, 15 Jun 2017 13:52:04 -0700, Brendan || Lyn Perrine wrote:
>On Thu, 15 Jun 2017 16:17:53 +0000 aconcernedfossdev at airmail.cc wrote:
>> Oh exaulted one, I am so sorry to have wasted your inbox space.
>> You see we all live for you, exalted aryan queen!

Hi,

should we tolerate the above tone of voice from an anonymous disposable
email account? We all make mistakes, but we are using our real names
and/or identifiable email accounts.

>I personally care about gpl enforcement but am a bit too broke right
>now to donate money and do not possess the social skills to be in a
>courtroom nor do I personally have any code in the linux kernel. 

It's not my domain, but seemingly Ubuntu provides AppArmor and no
GRSecurity at all. However, the problem with this person aren't the
concerns. It's the tone of voice and that there isn't an evidence for a
violation.

Regards,
Ralf




More information about the Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list