My opinion on Ubuntu cancelling Intel 80386/80386-clone processor support
JMZ
florentior at gmail.com
Wed Sep 7 02:15:40 UTC 2016
On 09/06/2016 09:58 PM, John Moser wrote:
<snip>
> Is this even worth the resources? There are multiple issues here, most
> obvious being the distinction between a current-generation operating
> system (Ubuntu) and a special-purpose software project (to target
> legacy hardware). Is legacy 32-bit support part of Ubuntu's mission,
> or are resources best diverted to improving the system for the other
> 99.99% of use cases? Like it or not, i586 is probably less than one in
> ten thousand installations.
<snip>
Wow, thanks John. Your intensive explanation of e-waste and its impact
on the environment and human labor is very enlightening. Now I'll think
twice about recommending Pentium 4's as good candidates for
low-intensity computing. Better to leave them at the dump.
I don't spend more than $200 on a laptop or desktop. Two/three-year-old
off lease 64-bit machines are everywhere. Still, the <$200 price band
may be expensive for startup schools, low-income people, etc. Perhaps
donation money should be given for the purchase of used dual cores or
better. A mass market non-upgradeable $50 64-bit slim client would be
helpful even in developed countries, but I see no profit there.
Jordan
More information about the Ubuntu-devel-discuss
mailing list