Ubuntu 16.04 Secure Boot Policy

Ralf Mardorf ralf.mardorf at alice-dsl.net
Sun Jul 3 20:36:35 UTC 2016

Oops :D

>On Sun, 3 Jul 2016 15:18:44 -0500, Kaosu NA wrote:
>>Not only will something like this be more user-friendly, but it
>>also allows a large number of Ubuntu users to take advantage of a
>>modern security technology without giving up usability.  
>Secure boot is modern, but it is useful for Linux and BSD users? Most
                            is it
>user-friendly still is to disable secure boot, isn't it?
>What are the benefits of secure boot for Linux and BSD users, who
>don't have a dual or multi boot with a Windows install, that requires
>I'm neither using SELinux, nor AppArmor or anything else. Isn't
>AppArmor part of default Linux install? Isn't this enough additional
>security?                ^^^^^
                          ^^^^^ Ubuntu ;)

More information about the Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list