Is this so hard to fix? Or important?

[Ma Xiaojun]

On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Rodney Dawes
<rodney.dawes at canonical.com> wrote:
> It's not an excuse. It's a fact. More importantly, the Ubuntu release
> name is no
> longer "warty" either, so that alone should give you some insight on why
> it is
> still named the way it is. How about simply making it actually be a .png
> instead
> of a JPEG (so that it will be a higher quality image, as JPEG
> compression tends
> to result in artifacts, particularly when scaling).

Anything you mentioned is worth doing, I'm looking forward to my Saucy
break one day because the wallpaper package.

> Furthermore, as already stated, this is a bug in eog (or perhaps
> gdk-pixbuf), if it
> can't open an image file where the extension doesn't match the content.
> While it
> would be nice to rename the file in question, it would be nicer to fix
> eog to not
> fail in such situations.

This shouldn't be a news either but I understand that eog's problem
should belongs to GNOME upstream.