Post-natty changes to unity [Was: Re: Ubuntu & Gnome 3.4]

Dane Mutters dmutters at
Fri Jan 6 21:34:52 UTC 2012

Though I think Unity still needs a -lot- of work, I find it much more
usable in Oneiric than it was in Natty.  I used it for several months
before switching to Gnome 3 in Oneiric, whereas I couldn't stand it for a
day in Natty.  (Keep up the good work.)  I can't speak to whether there
have been regressions, but I can speak to a marked improvement in overall


On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Bruno Girin <brunogirin at> wrote:

> On 06/01/12 15:58, Evan Huus wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 10:41 AM, James Haigh<james.r.haigh at>
>>  wrote:
>>> I was a keen Unity fan when Natty came out. However, since Oneiric,
>>> Unity is the main reason why I'm still using Natty.
>> I find that very interesting. My personal opinion (and the general
>> majority opinion, as far as I can tell) is that the Oneiric changes to
>> unity were clear improvements.
> I second that: I installed Oneiric beta on my new laptop rather than Natty
> because Unity in Natty was flaky with my hardware.
> Bruno
> --
> Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
> Ubuntu-devel-discuss at lists.**<Ubuntu-devel-discuss at>
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:**
> mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-**discuss<>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list