Post-natty changes to unity [Was: Re: Ubuntu & Gnome 3.4]

[Dane Mutters]

Though I think Unity still needs a -lot- of work, I find it much more
usable in Oneiric than it was in Natty.  I used it for several months
before switching to Gnome 3 in Oneiric, whereas I couldn't stand it for a
day in Natty.  (Keep up the good work.)  I can't speak to whether there
have been regressions, but I can speak to a marked improvement in overall
usability.

--Dane

On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Bruno Girin <brunogirin at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 06/01/12 15:58, Evan Huus wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 10:41 AM, James Haigh<james.r.haigh at gmail.com>
>>  wrote:
>>
>>> I was a keen Unity fan when Natty came out. However, since Oneiric,
>>> Unity is the main reason why I'm still using Natty.
>>>
>> I find that very interesting. My personal opinion (and the general
>> majority opinion, as far as I can tell) is that the Oneiric changes to
>> unity were clear improvements.
>>
>
> I second that: I installed Oneiric beta on my new laptop rather than Natty
> because Unity in Natty was flaky with my hardware.
>
> Bruno
>
>
>
> --
> Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
> Ubuntu-devel-discuss at lists.**ubuntu.com<Ubuntu-devel-discuss at lists.ubuntu.com>
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/**
> mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-**discuss<https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-discuss/attachments/20120106/0c1bc82f/attachment.html>