ondemand vs conservative
Phillip Susi
psusi at cfl.rr.com
Thu Sep 30 16:32:45 UTC 2010
On 9/29/2010 5:05 PM, Daniel Hollocher wrote:
> Yeah, I saw that. I think that is also on wikipedia. So maybe
> ondemand is for battery usage. It would still be nice to have
> conservative for plugged in situations, like a desktop.
>
> I did try to google first, I just didn't see a clear answer.
Conservative is supposed to save more power by keeping the frequency
lower. Which one is used should make little difference to a cpu bound
benchmark since both will end up at the max frequency before long. The
ondemand should be slightly better since it will hit the max frequency
faster.
More information about the Ubuntu-devel-discuss
mailing list