man 2 write - clarification
Joey Schulze
joey at infodrom.org
Thu Mar 18 19:47:39 UTC 2010
Joey Schulze wrote:
> Lucian Adrian Grijincu wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > The following phrase taken from man 2 write manual page is confusing:
> > > POSIX Â requires that a read(2) which can be proved to occur after a
> > > write() has returned returns the new data.
> > >
> > > I think you should you some comas to make a clear statement.
> > > POSIX Â requires that a read(2), which can be proved to occur after a
> > > write() has returned, returns the new data.
> >
> > I think this should be reported upstream directly.
>
> I have forwarded Daniel's suggestion already.
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=574041
It might be a good idea to add a link to this discussion on
-devel-discuss to the bug report at 574041 (at) bugs.debian.org
Regards,
Joey
--
Ten years and still binary compatible. -- XFree86
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.
More information about the Ubuntu-devel-discuss
mailing list